Nike: All Conditions Gear

How Nike’s ACG moved from mountain to metropolis, and back again

All Conditions Gear

In 2026, Nike has returned to one of its most elusive and shape-shifting lines with a rare sense of clarity. Nike ACG (All Conditions Gear), a label that has spent decades drifting between outdoor performance, subcultural relevance and design experimentation, is being repositioned with a far more direct ambition, to function as a serious outdoor performance brand rather than a stylistic side project.

That might sound like a simple correction, but ACG has never been simple. Since its introduction in 1989, it has moved through distinct identities, each reflecting a different idea of what “all conditions” might actually mean.

The original version was pragmatic, even scrappy. ACG emerged at a time when Nike was looking beyond track and court, turning its attention to harsher terrain. Early pieces were built for hiking, trail running and unpredictable weather, and they carried a visual language that felt unusually expressive for performance gear. Bright colours, odd silhouettes and a willingness to experiment gave the line a personality that set it apart from more conservative outdoor brands. It was technical, but never sterile. In hindsight, it reads as a precursor to what would later be labelled Gorpcore 1, long before the term existed.

By the early 2000s, that identity had thinned. Nike’s focus shifted back towards more popular sports like basketball and running, and ACG became inconsistent, at times barely visible. It existed, but without direction, a product line that had lost its reason for being.

A radical reinvention came in 2014 when Canadian designer and Acronym co-founder Errolson Hugh joined the team. Hugh was renowned for his pioneering techwear with Acronym and its systems-based approach blending performance apparel with urban functionality. What followed was less an evolution than a complete reframing. The outdoors receded, replaced by the city. Garments were conceived not as items for specific activities, but as systems designed for movement through urban environments. The aesthetic turned sharply minimal, often monochrome, with an emphasis on modular construction and advanced materials.

This was the moment ACG became culturally attractive again. Under Hugh, it helped define the visual language of techwear, influencing a generation of designers and reshaping expectations around what performance apparel could look like. Yet that influence came with a trade-off. The collections were conceptually rigorous but niche, admired as much as they were worn. When Hugh departed in 2018, ACG once again found itself at a crossroads, having gained cultural capital but lacking the broad customer base.

Nike ACG Ultrafly
Nike ACG Ultrafly Trail Racing Shoes
Nike ACG
Nike ACG
Nike ACG Lava Loft
Nike ACG Lava Loft Jacket

What followed was a quieter period of recalibration. Nike leaned into its own archive, reintroducing elements of the 1990s line, brighter palettes, more recognisable outdoor silhouettes, and a softer, more accessible interpretation of technical clothing. The rise of gorpcore helped, bringing renewed attention to outdoor aesthetics, but ACG still felt caught between identities, neither fully performance-driven nor fully conceptual.

This is a defining moment in ACG's history — a recommitment to all conditions and an invitation to athletes: unplug, get outside and explore. ACG has the foundation to shape the future of outdoor performance while pushing into spaces that feel fresh and unexpected. It is going to be a fun ride.
Scott LeClair
VP/GM, ACG

The 2026 relaunch marks a decisive break from that ambiguity. Rather than oscillating between past and present, Nike has chosen to anchor ACG firmly in performance. The language surrounding the relaunch is focused on trail running, hiking and exploration, and on athletes who operate in genuinely unpredictable environments. It’s less about reinterpretation and more about reaffirmation.

Part of that shift is structural. Nike Trail 2, previously a parallel initiative, is being absorbed into ACG, consolidating the company’s outdoor efforts into a single, more coherent platform. Product development is increasingly tied to real-world testing, with trail runners feeding directly into the design process. The tone has shifted too. Earlier ACG iterations often came across as bold statements, whereas the current version feels more like a foundation to build on.

There is a visible effort to give ACG its own physical and cultural space. Dedicated retail concepts, such as the Base Camp store in Beijing, signal an intention to build a standalone identity rather than a sub-label that exists within Nike’s broader ecosystem. At the same time, its presence at the 2026 Winter Olympics 3, through Team USA apparel, reinforces a renewed emphasis on performance credibility, positioning ACG within the context of elite sport rather than niche cultures.

Nike ACG Base Camp
Base Camp store in Beijing
Nike ACG Base Camp
Base Camp store in Beijing

The timing is not incidental. The outdoor market has become one of the most competitive and culturally relevant spaces in fashion and performance apparel, with brands like Arc’teryx and Salomon gaining ground both technically and aesthetically. ACG, with its hybrid history, enters that space with a different kind of advantage. It has already moved through multiple identities, from authentic outdoor gear to conceptual techwear, and carries traces of both.

What makes the current moment feel distinct is the sense that Nike is no longer treating those shifts as experiments. Instead, ACG is being framed as a long-term pillar, one that can operate credibly in outdoor performance while retaining the cultural elasticity that has defined it in the past. The ambition is not to return to a single era, but to stabilise the line after decades of movement.

ACG has often felt slightly out of phase, too expressive for traditional outdoor brands, too technical for mainstream fashion. The 2026 relaunch suggests a different approach, one that accepts that tension but anchors it in something more concrete. Performance is the priority, but the brand’s history is still reflected in the design language.

For a product line that has spent much of its existence searching for definition, that alone feels like a significant shift.

  1. A fashion trend in which functional outdoor clothing, originally designed for hiking and exploration, is worn in urban environments as everyday style.
  2. Nike’s trail running category, focused on off-road footwear and apparel, which has been integrated into ACG as part of the brand’s 2026 shift toward a unified outdoor performance platform.
  3. Nike used the global stage of the 2026 Winter Olympics to relaunch ACG, outfitting athletes and leveraging the event to reintroduce the brand as a performance-focused outdoor line.